On May 12, 2026, Chief Judge Martin Glenn of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a 27-page memorandum opinion in In re Iovate Health Sciences International Inc., Case No. 25-11958 (MG), recognizing and enforcing an Approval and Reverse Vesting Order entered by the Ontario Superior Court of

On April 15, 2026, Judge Alfredo R. Pérez of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the modified joint prepackaged Chapter 11 plan of Cumulus Media Inc. and its debtor affiliates at the conclusion of a 48-minute hearing in Houston. The U.S. Trustee for Region 7, Kevin Epstein, was the

On March 26, 2026, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Hon. Brendan L. Shannon) entered a provisional order in In re The Cannabist Company Holdings Inc., Case No. 26-10426 (BLS), extending stay protections to the non-debtor U.S. subsidiaries of a Canadian cannabis company whose parent is restructuring under Canada’s Companies’ Creditors

In Palazzo v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 24-2169 (4th Cir. Mar. 20, 2026, amended Mar. 31, 2026), the Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for two mortgage servicers on FDCPA and automatic stay claims brought by a Chapter 13 debtor. Applying the “commonsense inquiry” the court adopted in In re Dubois and reaffirmed in

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York recently rejected arguments that a foreign debtor’s incorporation outside the United States and concurrent foreign restructuring proceedings should compel dismissal of an involuntary Chapter 11 petition. In re Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd. (S.D.N.Y., March 3, 2026) clarifies that U.S. courts retain meaningful jurisdiction

The Supreme Court’s January 2026 decision in Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton, 607 U.S. 155 (2026), resolves a significant circuit split and reinforces a basic principle of judicial efficiency: judgments must eventually become final, even when they suffer from procedural defects. The Court held, without dissent, that Federal Rule of

In the January 15, 2026 decision rendered in In re The Aspen Chapel, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado provided a significant reminder that bankruptcy, while a powerful tool for financial restructuring, cannot be weaponized to circumvent the statutory protections Congress extended to tenants occupying leased real property. The case

When a special purpose acquisition company burns through capital pursuing a failed deal, it often emerges from the wreckage with nothing but litigation claims. How, then, should a debtor with no operational revenue prosecute those claims? Judge John P. Mastando III addressed precisely this challenge in January 2026 in In re SPAC Recovery Co.

On December 1, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in In re GOL Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A., 675 B.R. 125 (S.D.N.Y. 2025), reversing a bankruptcy court’s confirmation of third-party releases that relied on an opt-out mechanism. Judge Denise Cote held that a creditor’s silence—a failure